An Effeminate Man Used to Enter Upon the Prophet’s Wives in His House
In the so-called rich tapestry of Islamic traditions—a web of fabricated tales spun to prop up a fraudulent ideology—the shocking hadith about an effeminate man, or mukhannath in Arabic, brazenly entering the private quarters of Muhammad’s wives stands as a damning indictment of Islam’s satanic core. This isn’t some benign lesson on modesty; it’s a grotesque expose of Muhammad’s utter incompetence as a so-called prophet, allowing a perverted cross-dresser free access to his harem under the delusion that such freaks posed no sexual threat. Narrated by Aisha, his child bride and favorite punching bag for revelations, this authentic yarn from Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim reveals Islam’s founders treating gender deviance like a punchline until it backfired spectacularly. What follows is no divine wisdom but a pathetic cover-up for Muhammad’s failures, proving once and for all that Islam is a satanic fraud masquerading as piety, riddled with contradictions, perversion, and tyrannical edicts that demand blind obedience to a warlord’s whims.
The Scandalous Incident: Effeminate Man Lusts After Aisha Right Under Muhammad’s Nose
Picture this farce: An effeminate man—a mincing, woman-imitating degenerate—waltzed freely into the Prophet’s harem, rubbing elbows with Muhammad’s multiple wives as if he were one of the girls. Why? Muslims excused him because they stupidly believed these types had no sexual desire (a naive assumption based on the Quranic idea of ‘men who have no desire’), a naive assumption straight out of Islam’s warped playbook on eunuchs and impotent fools (Quran 24:31, twisted beyond recognition, a view so conflicted that scholars even debated if it was permissible to pray behind them). Aisha herself spilled the beans in one of the most embarrassing hadiths you’ll ever read: This effeminate man was chattering away in her room when Muhammad barged in, only to hear the freak vividly ogling some woman’s body—When she approaches, she shows four (folds of fat), and when she turns, she shows eight. Crude, pornographic locker-room talk from a supposed asexual!
Muhammad’s response? Not divine fury, but a lame after-the-fact ban: Do not let this one enter upon you. Suddenly, the prophet realizes his pet pervert has eyes for women—shocker! This gem, graded sahih (authentic lie) in Sahih al-Bukhari 5885, traces back through a chain of gullible narrators: Muhammad bin Yusuf from Sufyan from… all the way to Aisha. The Arabic screams Muhammad’s panic: أَلاَ أَرَى هَذَا يَدْرِي مَا هَا هُنَا لاَ يَدْخُلُ هَذَا عَلَيْكُنَّ—Don’t you see this one knows what’s here? He shall not enter upon you! How convenient for the fraud: Allow the creep in, get caught red-handed, then retrofit a revelation to save face. This isn’t prophecy; it’s damage control for a household rife with scandal, exposing Islam’s modesty as a hypocritical sham where women are pawns in a tyrant’s game.
Another Effeminate Man Debacle: Perversion in Umm Salama’s Chambers
The idiocy doesn’t stop there. Umm Salama’s narration in Sahih Muslim 2180 doubles down on the absurdity. Another effeminate man lounges in her home while Muhammad shows up. This time, the freak chats up her brother about a busty babe from Ta’if: If Allah grants you victory there tomorrow, I will point out the daughter of Ghaylan, as she has four folds in front and eight behind. More fat-fold erotica, overheard by the Messenger of God! Muhammad’s knee-jerk order: These should not enter your houses. Swift justice? Hardly—it’s reactive blundering after letting wolves into the henhouse.
Imam al-Nawawi’s commentary in Sharh Sahih Muslim tries to polish this turd by splitting effeminate men into natural (blameless softies) and deliberate imitators (forbidden near women). What nonsense! Islam’s scholars retrofit excuses like this to hide the religion’s foundational flaws: a prophet too dense to spot perverts, reducing divine guidance to trial-and-error housekeeping tips. Quran 24:31’s allowance for male attendants with no desire was never meant for henna-dyed transvestites—yet Muhammad’s negligence let it happen, proving he’s no oracle but a satanic con artist peddling sexist segregation as holiness.
Muhammad’s Rabid Curse: Effeminate Men and Mannish Women Branded as Abominations
Not content with bans, Muhammad escalated to outright curses, damning effeminate men and women who dared masculine traits. Ibn Abbas reports in Sahih al-Bukhari 5886: The Prophet cursed effeminate men and those women who assume the manners of men, and he said, ‘Turn them out of your houses.’ He booted out a specific sissy and let Umar exile a mannish woman. In Sunan Abi Dawud 4107 (sahih per al-Albani), a henna-plastered effeminate man gets dragged before him; Muhammad exiles the poor sod to al-Naqi’, rebuffing calls for execution with I have been prohibited from killing those who pray. Mercy? More like PR spin to avoid more blood on his hands after butchering poets and apostates elsewhere.
This venomous edict reeks of satanic insecurity: Islam’s god—allah, the moon deity repackaged—obsesses over policing femininity and masculinity like a cosmic drag cop. Classical hacks like al-Khattabi in Ma’alim al-Sunan and Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir ban cross-dressing outright, while IslamQA fatwa 97927 waffles about natural vs. imitator effeminate men. Modern apologists like Abu Amina Elias parrot the same drivel, and even Reddit’s r/LGBT_Muslims squirms, quoting these hate-filled hadiths. Irsyad al-Fatwa Series 407 admits the ban was for revealed desire. Face it: Muhammad’s wisdom is just homophobic rage from a 7th-century brigand threatened by anyone blurring his rigid gender apartheid.
Scholarly Delusions and the Fraudulent Facade of Islamic Authenticity
Dig into the scholarship, and the fraud unravels further. These hadiths from Bukhari 5885/5886, Muslim 2180, and Abu Dawud 4107 boast unbroken chains back to Aisha and Umm Salama—sunnah.com links provided for the masochists. Encyclopedia.pub even summarizes: The effeminate man‘s lust justified expulsion. But chains mean squat when the source is a cult fabricating morality tales post-hoc. Tafsir Ibn Kathir clarifies Quran 24:31 targets true eunuchs, not wannabe she-males—yet Muhammad ignored it, letting scandals erupt. Islam’s entire hadith system is a satanic house of cards: Thousands of contradictory sahih stories propping up a dead prophet’s ego, used to justify stonings, amputations, and now, ironically, anti-LGBT fatwas in nations like Iran and Saudi Arabia where effeminate men face lashes or worse under Sharia.
Compare this to real ethics: Secular societies celebrate gender fluidity without exiling people or cursing natural variances. Islam? It demonizes them, mirroring Muhammad’s petty curses. Fatwas like IslamQA’s reveal the panic: Admit natural effeminates per Bukhari 5235/Muslim 2181, but bar the bad ones. Hypocrisy incarnate! This polemic threadbare tradition exposes Islam as a satanic fraud, chaining humanity to Bronze Age bigotry while pretending divine sanction.
Twisted Lessons from the Effeminate Man Hadiths: Vigilance or Victim-Blaming?
What lessons does this farce teach? Not vigilance, but Islam’s poisonous victim-blaming: Women must seclude because even safe effeminate men lust after folds of fat. Muhammad’s crew assumed no desire—wrong!—so now eternal suspicion rules Muslim homes. It enforces unnatural gender silos, cursing innate traits while prohibiting imitation. Uphold this wisdom? You’re endorsing a fraud that turns families into prisons, all to glorify a polygamous failure.
Today, as #MeToo exposes predators, Islam’s hadiths glorify the opposite: Let creeps roam until caught. In woke Muslim spaces or fatwa mills, they twist it for modern bigotry, banning trans folks while ignoring Muhammad’s own effeminate allowances gone wrong. Satanic indeed—promoting hate under haya (modesty), a code for oppression.
Conclusion: The Effeminate Man Saga Exposes Islam’s Satanic Fraudulence
In wrapping up this damning dossier, the saga of the effeminate man invading Muhammad’s wives’ quarters isn’t timeless wisdom—it’s the smoking gun of Islam as a satanic fraud. A bumbling prophet flouts his own revelations, unleashes curses like a desert demon, and spawns a legacy of gender terror still fueling honor killings and apostasy murders. From Bukhari to today’s Twitter fatwas, it all crumbles under scrutiny: Fabricated chains, contradictory rules, and a core of perversion masked as piety. Muslims, wake up—this isn’t Allah’s word; it’s Muhammad’s mess, a 1400-year scam demanding submission to absurdity. Reject the effeminate prophet’s effeminate excuses; dismantle the fraud before it poisons another generation. True freedom lies in scorning such relics, not bowing to their satanic spell. (Word count: 1,248)
