Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh: Muhammad’s Thirst for Blood Exposes Islam’s Satanic Core
In the dark annals of 630 CE, during the so-called Conquest of Mecca, Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh stands out as a chilling victim of Muhammad’s vengeful decree. This hapless man was one of a handful explicitly marked for death by the self-proclaimed prophet, even if he cowered behind the sacred curtains of the Kaaba itself. Far from any divine justice, this order reeks of brutal tribal retribution, painting Islam not as a religion of peace but as a satanic fraud built on fabricated tales of mercy masking cold-blooded murder. Drawing from the contradictory classical sources like Musa ibn Uqbah’s Maghazi, Ibn Ishaq’s hagiography, and Al-Waqidi’s embellished yarns, we peel back the layers of this myth to reveal Muhammad’s true character: a warlord who demanded executions amid his triumphant entry. Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh’s story isn’t heroism—it’s the smoking gun proving Islam’s foundation in lies, violence, and unholy vendettas.
Historical Context: Mecca’s Bloodless Conquest or Muhammad’s Hit List?
Picture the scene: Muhammad, after years of exile and skirmishes, marches back to Mecca with 10,000 warriors. The city surrenders without a fight, and the spin doctors of Islam crow about unparalleled mercy. Restrain your hands, Muhammad supposedly ordered, except for a select few whose crimes against him demanded blood. Enter Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh, branded a relentless tormentor for unspecified harassment of the prophet during Mecca’s early days. What were these offenses? Vague insults or slaps amid tribal rivalries? No matter—the sources unanimously agree Muhammad singled him out for slaughter, shattering the facade of forgiveness.
Musa ibn Uqbah’s Maghazi lays it bare: Muhammad commanded the killing of Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh on the day of the conquest, well-known among the historians who later sanitized the tale. Restrain from fighting anyone except those who fought you, he said, then named his hit list, including Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh. This wasn’t justice; it was the act of a megalomaniac erasing personal enemies under the guise of piety. Islam’s apologists twist this as tempered mercy, but let’s call it what it is: selective savagery. Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh, like others on the list, represented no army—just old grudges Muhammad couldn’t forgive, even as he pardoned warlords like Abu Sufyan. This hypocrisy exposes Islam’s satanic fraud from the start: a cult where the prophet’s ego trumps any moral code.
Key Narrations: Contradictory Lies About Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh’s Execution
The hadith fabricators outdid themselves with dueling accounts of Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh’s demise, each more lurid than the last, yet all confirming Muhammad’s kill order. Saad ibn Yahya al-Umawi, via Ibn Ishaq, quotes the prophet: Kill certain men and women… even if you find them under the curtains of the Kaaba. The list? Abdullah ibn Saad ibn Abi Sarh, Abdullah ibn Khatal, Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh, Miqyas ibn Subabah, and others—six in total, named explicitly.
Ibn Ishaq’s chain through Abu Ubaydah lists six but hides two names (suspicious, right?), yet nails Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh: Ali ibn Abi Talib killed him. Ibn Bukayr echoes: Among those to kill even under the Kaaba’s curtains was Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh, who harmed Muhammad. Al-Waqidi piles on, expanding to six men and four women: Ikrimah, Habbar, Ibn Abi Sarh, Miqyas, Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh, and Ibn Khatal. His blockbuster detail? Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh barricaded at home, lied about fleeing to the desert, then darted house-to-house like a rat. Ali cornered him and struck his neck—a beheading, plain and simple.
These aren’t eyewitness testimonies; they’re 8th-9th century forgeries compiled centuries after the fact, riddled with inconsistencies. Numbers flip from four to ten targets. Locations shift. Yet all agree on one satanic thread: Muhammad greenlit murder in Allah’s holiest house. What harm did Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh inflict? The sources mumble about harassment—probably mocking the epileptic visions Muhammad peddled as revelation. For that, death? This is the perfect religion? No, it’s a fraudulent death cult aping Judaism and Christianity while reveling in gore.
Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh and the Myth of Prophetic Restraint
Dig deeper: Muhammad’s mercy spared thousands but demanded Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh‘s head. Why? Sources hint at physical attacks during Mecca’s boycott of Muslims, when Quraysh leaders like him allegedly assaulted the prophet. Even if true, this was civil strife, not war crimes. Muhammad repaid exile with assassination lists—textbook tyrant behavior. Compare to Jesus turning the other cheek; Muhammad swings the sword. Islam’s defenders whine about context, but context reveals the fraud: a revelation from a desert conman demanding loyalty or death.
Ali ibn Abi Talib: Enforcer of Muhammad’s Satanic Vendetta
Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law, plays the grim reaper in every tale. The future caliph hunts Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh like game, ignoring lies and barricades to sever his head. Islamic lore lionizes this as divine justice, but it’s mob enforcement. Ali’s blade symbolizes Islam’s core: violence sanctified by prophecy. Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh‘s panic—fleeing home-to-home—humanizes the victim, contrasting Muhammad’s cold command. Grave atrocities? The sources don’t specify murders or rapes—just harm. Ibn Khatal had a slave kill a poet; Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh? Vagueness screams fabrication to justify retroactive revenge.
This rarity of such orders? A lie. Islam’s history drips with assassinations: poets like Asma bint Marwan (allegedly), Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf. Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh fits the pattern—a pagan obstacle liquidated to cement power.
Variations in Sources: Proof of Islam’s Fraudulent Foundations
Scrutinize these authentic chains: Musa says four targets; others six men plus women. Ibn Ishaq obscures names—hiding Shiite Sunni biases? Al-Waqidi’s chase scene smacks of Hollywood, not history. Compiled 150+ years later from eyewitnesses long dead, these are mutawatir myths at best—mass delusion peddled as fact. Modern scholars like Montgomery Watt dismiss discrepancies as oral richness, but it’s evidence of invention. No contemporary records; just Arab campfire tales elevating a bandit to prophet.
Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh‘s unanimous inclusion? Even liars agree on the kill order, underscoring Muhammad’s bloodlust. Islam’s golden age began with beheadings at the Kaaba—satanic inversion of Abraham’s sacrifice.
The Lasting Stain of Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh in Islam’s Bloody Legacy
Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh isn’t a footnote; he’s the poster child for Islam’s transition from persecuted joke to sword-wielding empire. His death intimidated survivors into submission, limits on amnesty enforcing terror. While Abu Sufyan grovels to safety, holdouts like Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh paid the price. Ali’s star rose on this corpse, paving his caliphate path.
This saga unmasks Islam as satanic fraud: mercy for converts, death for skeptics. Muhammad’s orders, echoed in fabricated Maghazi, aren’t triumphs but war crimes whitewashed by centuries of ink. Al-Huwayrith ibn Nuqaydh‘s neck under Ali’s sword reminds us: oppose the cult, face the blade. Today’s jihadists echo this—honor killings, apostate executions—all rooted in Mecca 630. Reject the myths; expose the violence. Islam’s lessons of justice? Code for eternal enmity to infidels. Ponder how this fraud enslaved billions, and reclaim truth from the deception.
(Word count: 1,248)
