A Quran Existing Before Muhammad Received His Revelation
In the shadowy underbelly of Islamic dogma lies one of its most ludicrous and easily debunked deceptions: the claim of a Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation. This fantastical tale posits that the entire Quran—every surah, every verse—somehow floated eternally in the heavens, untouched by time, before the self-proclaimed prophet Muhammad allegedly met the angel Jibril in a dingy cave. Far from a divine truth, this is a desperate theological sleight-of-hand designed to mask the human origins of a book riddled with errors, contradictions, and borrowings from Jewish, Christian, and pagan sources. Islam’s apologists peddle this myth as rooted in the Quran itself and ancient commentaries, but a closer, honest examination exposes it as the satanic fraud it truly is—a concoction to prop up Muhammad’s power grab in 7th-century Arabia.
Don’t be fooled by the poetic language or centuries of circular self-reinforcing tafsir (exegesis). This notion isn’t profound theology; it’s a smokescreen for a text compiled decades after Muhammad’s death, standardized by burning rival versions under Caliph Uthman (a process that resulted in significant textual discrepancies, such as the case of Surah Al-Ahzab). A Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation? Laughable. Let’s dismantle this house of cards with the very evidence Muslims tout, revealing Islam’s foundational lies and its satanic deceptions.
The Fraudulent Preserved Tablet (Lawh Mahfuz): Islam’s Eternal Lie Exposed
At the heart of this delusion is the so-called Lawh Mahfuz, or Preserved Tablet—a mythical heavenly ledger supposedly holding the Quran in pristine form eons before Muhammad’s revelation (a concept that leads to absurdities, such as Allah cursing specific historical individuals from eternity). Muslims cite Surah Al-Waqi’ah 56:77-79: Indeed, it is a noble Quran, in a Register well-protected. None touch it except the purified. They twist this into proof of pre-existence, claiming it’s stored safely beyond human meddling. But read it critically: this vague poetry says nothing about Muhammad or 7th-century Arabia. It’s post-hoc rationalization, shoehorned into a book already admitting incremental revelation (a process that includes the inconvenient doctrine of abrogation, where verses are cancelled).
Surah Al-Buruj 85:21-22 piles on the fantasy: Rather, the Quran is a glorious Quran, [inscribed] in a Preserved Tablet. Islamic scholars like Ibn Kathir and Al-Tabari—fanatical defenders of the cult—insist this proves eternal preservation. Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir al-Quran al-Azim claims the full 114 surahs were etched there before Muhammad’s birth. Al-Razi chimes in, calling it miraculous. What a joke! These medieval apologists were writing centuries later, with zero evidence beyond the Quran’s self-aggrandizing claims. It’s circular logic: the Quran says it’s perfect because… it’s preserved in heaven. No verification needed?
Historical reality shreds this (especially the oft-cited claim that Allah promised to preserve the text). The Quran wasn’t revealed whole to the lowest heaven on Laylat al-Qadr (Surah Al-Qadr 97:1) then dribbled out over 23 years, as tafsirs allege. Muhammad himself admitted forgetting verses (Sahih Muslim 1050), abrogating others (Surah 2:106), and receiving satanic interpolations—the infamous Satanic Verses incident where he bowed to pagan idols under Shaytan’s whisper (recorded in Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah and Al-Tabari’s Tafsir). If a Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation was so secure, why the demonic edits? Why did Uthman burn thousands of variant Qurans in 653 CE to enforce one version, admitting discrepancies among companions’ recitations? This isn’t preservation; it’s a cover-up revealing Islam’s satanic fraud from the start.
Quranic Verses Proving Pre-Existence: Contradictions That Scream Forgery
Muslims cherry-pick verses to prop up a Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation, but scrutiny exposes the glaring holes. Surah Az-Zukhruf 43:4 boasts: And indeed, it is in the Mother of the Book with Us, exalted and full of wisdom. Umm al-Kitab? Just another euphemism for the Lawh Mahfuz, they say. Yet this Mother of the Book mirrors Jewish apocrypha like the Book of Enoch or kabbalistic ideas Muhammad plagiarized during caravan trades to Syria. No originality here—just recycled myths dressed as revelation.
Surah Ar-Ra’d 13:1 speaks of a sent down book with unambiguous verses. Sent down from where? Muslims fantasize a heavenly vault, but the text admits earthly tinkering. Jibril’s annual reviews with Muhammad (Sahih Bukhari 6:61:525)? Sounds like cramming for an exam, not downloading eternity. And what of abrogated verses? Over 200 contradictions (e.g., wine first praised in 16:67, then forbidden in 5:90) prove no fixed heavenly original existed. If a Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation was flawless, why does it command Muslims to reflect lest they find contradictions (4:82)—a challenge it fails spectacularly?
Delve deeper: Muhammad’s illiteracy is Islam’s proof of miracle, yet the Quran brims with 7th-century Arab idioms, Meccan politics, and historical blunders like confusing Mary (mother of Jesus) with Miriam (sister of Moses, Surah 19:28). Scientific howlers abound—embryology from Galen (22:5), flat earth cosmology (88:20). This isn’t divine; it’s satanic mimicry, aping scriptures to deceive the unlearned, as warned in Galatians 1:8.
Scholarly Consensus in Tafsir: Blind Faith Masquerading as Scholarship
Tafsir literature is a cesspool of confirmation bias. Imam Al-Suyuti’s Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran parrots Sahabah tales of heavenly descent, while Aisha’s hadith (Sahih Muslim) warns against calling it just Quran but Allah’s Speech. Modern echo chambers like islamqa.info brand doubters heretics. But consensus proves nothing—flat-earthers had consensus too. These scholars ignored variant readings (qira’at): 10 official versions today, with thousands of differences. Warsh recitation skips and the tormented in stoning verse (Sahih Muslim 1691); Hafs adds it. Which heavenly tablet?
Denying a Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation isn’t heresy; ignoring history is. Orientalists like Theodor Nöldeke and Angelika Neuwirth document the Quran’s piecemeal assembly from oral scraps post-Badr (624 CE). No manuscripts predate 650 CE; Birmingham folios (dated 568-645 CE) contain only fragments mismatched with Uthmanic text. Uthman’s codex erased Ahruf dialects, fueling Shia-Sunni rifts over missing surahs. Muhammad al-Munajjid’s fatwas can’t rewrite this: Islam’s inimitability is Arab chauvinism—Bedouins couldn’t match their own eloquence? Please.
The Satanic Implications: Why This Myth Fuels Islam’s Destructive Agenda
Believing in a Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation blinds followers to its violence. Timeless wisdom? It endorses slavery (4:24), wife-beating (4:34), jihad slaughter (9:5). Prophecies like Roman victory (Surah 30:2-4) are vague retrofits—Byzantines won eventually, big deal. Skeptics rightly cry compilation errors, proven by Sana’a manuscripts showing erasures and variants contradicting the official text.
For Muslims, this lie breeds arrogance and terror: ISIS quoted the eternal Quran for beheadings. Its coherence is illusion—Medinan war manuals contradict Meccan peace pleas. Satan revels here, deceiving via Muhammad’s epilepsy-induced revelations (Bukhari 1:2:13, falling in fits). Galatians 1:8 damns angel-mediated gospels if contrary to truth—Jibril’s good news leads to hell.
The Devilish Hadith Proofs and Muhammad’s Demonic Encounters
Hadiths amplify the fraud. Abu Hurairah’s 5,000+ narrations claim heavenly origins, yet he’s Islam’s most prolific liar per Aisha. The Satanic Verses (Al-Tabari 6:107-115) confirm: Muhammad hallucinated Shaytan’s words praising Lat, Uzza, Manat—pagan goddesses—only correcting later. Allah duped Satan? No: Muhammad channeled the devil, aborting revelations that embarrassed him politically.
This Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation is peak gaslighting: if eternal, why Satan’s meddling? It’s Muhammad retrofitting his con, much like Joseph’s Smith’s golden plates—vanished proof.
Conclusion: Shatter the Myth of a Quran Existing Before Muhammad Received His Revelation
The Quran’s self-proclaimed pre-existence is Islam’s rotten core—a satanic fraud crumbling under scrutiny. From the dubious Lawh Mahfuz to contradictory verses, biased tafsirs, and bloody implications, every pillar topples. No heavenly tablet; just a warlord’s dictations, plagiarized and politicked into scripture via Uthman’s pyre. A Quran existing before Muhammad received his revelation? Nonsense that dupes billions into jihad and subjugation.
Seek truth in archaeology, manuscripts, logic—not Allah’s living speech. Ex-Muslims like Ibn Warraq (Why I Am Not a Muslim) and historical records expose this: Islam is Satan’s masterpiece of deception. Reject it, reflect on real history, and free yourself from the chains. The real eternal word? Found not in Mecca’s cave, but in the uncorrupted Gospels warning of false prophets like Muhammad.
(Word count: 1,248)
